12/26/2023 0 Comments Photo batch processor![]() Raw files will be automatically developed, and both the exported file format and image dimensions are configurable.īatch jobs can work in conjunction with Macros. The Batch Job feature allows you to specify an unrestricted number of source files to process and export. ![]() The Batch Job dialog with files added to the Sources list. The current version on Brown's website is called Image Processor Pro.Batch jobs allow a number of image files to be processed: specific processing instructions can be automated, boosting workflow efficiency. Now with every new release of Photoshop the power in Image Processor is increased and the script is improved and refined. As the functionality improved and the bugs were ironed out, Adobe started including the script in Photoshop about three versions ago. It started out as a Javascript routine developed by Russell Brown to provide functionality that wasn't readily available in Photoshop.(its insanely difficult to create actions/batch process to separate output formats and sizes simultaneously). You have to understand the history of Image Processor. Wouldn't this be closer to what people need?. Ps I also cannot see why Adobe do not give you the option during on-screen resizing to choose the size of the 'longer side' without having to mess around with the Fit Image routine in Batch mode. I hope some more people chime in with their views or suggestions, especially on the differences (advantages/disadvantages) between the Batch Processor and the Image Processor. I can't see why Adobe do not have just ONE Batch/Processor routine that allows you to specify what Actions to be performed before and after the selected conversions (if any). Unlike the version of Image Processor shipped with CS5, the more recent versions on Russell Brown's website have a drop-down box that allows you to specify whether the action is run before or after resizing so that difference from the Batch Processor no longer exists. Running an action with Image Processor is purely optional. To me, the biggest difference in the two approaches is that Batch Processing ALWAYS requires an action to run while, as you point out, Image Processor can resize and output in three file formats simultaneously. Normally, you'd want to run all Actions and then resize, convert to sRGB and save, with the exception of a 'last step' sharpening. However, as I see it, it has a disadvantage in the fact that it does the conversions and In fact it is better than the Batch processor because (as you say) it does not have the 'save file' quirks of the BP. I didn't realize it can also execute Actions (just one after all conversions). I haven't played much with the PS Image Processor in the past, as I was under the impression it is mainly for resizing and conversions. I was thinking about it myself in the past and more so now after your comments. Maybe you are right in what you are saying. No problem Suddie, on the contrary, your comments are most welcome and appreciated Brown's 1-2-3 Process:īoth Image Processor and 1-2-3 Process also have the added advantage of not having to deal with suppressing modal dialog boxes. Image Processor) or, even better yet, Dr. ![]() Its not my intent to rain on your parade but I don't see anything in your tutorial that can't be more easily accomplished by using Image Processor (File >
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |